A gift economy is one which does not artificially demarcate production from consumption, as the neoclassicals do in their models. Bibliovault You may purchase this title at In so doing, he disputes the relevance and applicability of neoclassical economic concepts, methods, and theory for the investigation of non-capitalist economic organization and development. He argues that the model incorrectly universalizes categories specific to Western capitalism, which have in turn resulted in dismissive explanations of gift exchange as a primitive form of capitalism, hindering the analysis of local realities. Site Map Unlike commodity economies, which emphasize production and productive consumption, gift economies (correctly identified by Mauss as an earlier evolutionary stage) privilege consumption and consumptive production. Find items in libraries near you. Chicago Manual of Style Book Review. these fine bookstores. The reappearance of this work is timely, for two reasons. Although the book is not a revision, the new thirty-three-page preface provides extensive response to works by Appadurai and others and clarifies the major points of Gregory’s analysis. It is still seen as a classic, but at the same time, in many quarters, its overall argument remains systematically misrepresented as essentializing or totalizing—in ways that should have been self-evidently … Concluding, Gregory emphasizes the neoclassical model’s poor explanatory potential — this in my opinion is the text’s strongest contribution and renders it an enduring classic. Christopher A. Gregory’s Gifts and Commodities is one of the undisputed classics of economic anthropology. Gregory’s book is timely because it begins with a substantial consideration of key elements of neoclassical economics, presented in terms of what Gregory calls ‘economics’, and contrasts them with what is probably the most established systemic approach, political economy. Chris Gregory’s work constitutes probably the single most important body of eco­nomic anthropology produced in the last half century.… This new edition of Gifts and commodities will be remembered as an enduring classic for a very long time to come. This new edition, we hope, will maintain and perhaps help to elevate the work’s status as a rigorous counter -argument to theories that remain largely unquestioned in political decision-making. "Although he pays his respects to Mauss in constructing this broad category, Gregory’s gift economy has only tenuous links to the ethnography of Maori hau or to ceremonial exchange systems such as kula. international sales information. . Gifts and Commodities (2nd edn) the 2010 documentary Inside Job). Book Review: Chris Gregory, Gifts and Commodities, 2nd edition. Unlike commodity economies, which emphasize production and productive consumption, gift economies (correctly identified by Mauss as an earlier evolutionary stage) privilege consumption and consumptive production. Turabian Gifts and Commodities, Part 4 Chris A. Gregory Snippet view - 1982. Essential. Outside the USA, see our “Gregory’s work constitutes probably the single most important body of economic anthropology produced in the last half century. On its publication in 1982, it spurred intense, ongoing debates about gifts and gifting, value, exchange, and the place of political economy in anthropology. Echoing Stephen Gudeman’s contemporaneous interest in the cultural construction of material livelihoods, Gregory pays close attention to ethnographic accounts of food and commensality, of fertility, sexuality, and cosmology. 4 (2016): 984-989. —David Graeber, London School of Economics, author of Debt: The first 5,000 years. WorldCat Home About WorldCat Help. Carrier, James G. “Gifts and Commodities (Second Edition), by Chris A. Gregory.” Anthropological Forum 26, no. Sear, Cynthia. . Yet, as Gregory notes in the preface to the second edition, much of the book’s reception has remained within in the discipline, and to his disappointment it ‘has had no impact on the thinking in the dominant mainstream paradigm: members of the economics discipline have simply ignored it’ (p. x1iv). Gifts and commodities is one of only a small handful of books from the latter part of the last century that fundamentally shifted the foundations of anthropology.… [T]he book now returns to wide circulation in this second edition with its thought-provoking new preface. . “Gregory’s work constitutes probably the single most important body of economic anthropology produced in the last half century. —Joel Robbins, University of Cambridge, author of Becoming sinners: Christian­ity and moral torment in a Papua New Guinea society. . As Gregory states, many countries have been ‘developed’ based on economic theories. Website. Economics as a discipline is an, if not the, authoritative voice in domestic and global politics (cf. Gifts and commodities. The idea that gift-exchange is a form of economy contrary to that of the market-exchange was later developed by Gregory for whom gifts belong to the sphere of the household and personal relationships, while commodities belong to the sphere of trade and impersonal relationships. the 2010 documentary Inside Job). Gifts and commodities is, at once, a critique of neoclassical economics and development theory, a critical history of colonial Papua New Guinea, and a comparative ethnography of exchange in Melanesian societies. Gregory contrasts gift and commodity exchange according to five criteria: Commodity exchange Gift exchange immediate exchange: delayed exchange alienable goods: inalienable goods actors independent: actors dependent quantitative relationship: qualitative relationship between objects: between people But other anthropologists refused to see these different "exchange spheres" as such … On its publication in 1982, it spurred intense, ongoing debates about gifts and gifting, value, exchange, and the place of political economy in anthropology. Although the book is not a revision, the new thirty-three-page preface provides extensive response to works by Appadurai and others and clarifies the major points of Gregory’s analysis. The second reason concerns intellectual shifts in anthropology. Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: or Search WorldCat. Rather, he follows the models of political economy represented by Quesnay, Smith, and Marx and synthesizes their conceptual foundations with the kinship studies of Morgan, Mauss, and Levi-Strauss to develop a ‘theory of gifts’ in which consumption and reproduction based on social relationships predominate over the role of individualistic production and profit.